Accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones: Spectrum of pathology and imaging evaluation

Applied Radiology — Vol. 36 , Issue 10 , pp. 28 -37

DOI: 10.37549/AR1556

Published: October 1, 2007

Babak N. Kalantari, MD, Leanne L. Seeger, MD, Kambiz Motamedi, MD, Kira Chow, MD

Categories

article Article ar

Accessory bones, or ossicles, are considered to be normal anatomic variants. Sesamoid bones are ovoid nodular bones, often small, found embedded within a tendon or joint capsule. Although accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones are generally considered clinically insignificant anatomic variations, they can become symptomatic. Traumatic conditions include acute fracture, stress fracture, and pseudarthrosis. Neoplastic and arthritic conditions are also encountered, as well as inflammatory and degenerative disorders.

This article reviews a spectrum of accessory ossicle and sesamoid pathology and provides guidelines for the preferred imaging modality for the suspected abnormality. We discuss some of the more commonly symptomatic bones, namely the os acromiale, os styloideum, metacarpal and hallux sesamoids, patella, os trigonum, os calcaneus secundarius, accessory navicular, os peroneum, and os intermetatarseum.

Os acromiale

There are normally 3 acromial ossification centers that fuse between 22 and 25 years of age. An os acromiale results from the failure of 1 of these centers to fuse. The anterior ossification center is termed the pre-acromion, the middle is the meso-acromion, and the posterior is the meta-acromion. The basi-acromion forms the point of attachment of these 3 ossification centers to the scapula. A number of subtypes of os acromiale have been described. The most common variant is nonfusion between the meso- and meta-acromion.1 The prevalence of os acromiale in radiographic and anatomic studies ranges between 1% and 15%.

An os acromiale can contribute to shoulder impingement symptoms. Contraction of the deltoid muscle may pull the os acromiale downward, causing it to impinge on the rotator cuff.2-4 Abnormal motion may lead to an osteophytic spur at the pseudarthrosis, which may also impinge on the cuff.

The diagnosis of os acromiale may be made on axillary projection radiographs, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MRI may show marrow edema and degenerative changes at a pseudarthrosis (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1. A 43-year-old man with a 5-year history of pinching shoulder pain, weakness, and restricted movement. (A) An axillary radiograph shows an os acromiale (arrow). (B) An axial gradient-echo MRI shows subtle marrow edema at the os acromiale articulation (arrows).

Os styloideum (carpal boss)

The os styloideum is an ununited bony protuberance, located on the dorsum of the wrist at the base of the second and third metacarpals. The association between dorsal wrist pain or fatigability and an os styloideum is known as carpal bossing (carpe bossu disease). Symptoms of carpal bossing may result from osteoarthritis, an overlying ganglion or bursitis, or from an extensor tendon slipping over the ossicle.5

The lateral radiographic view best profiles the os styloideum (Figure 2). CT may show degenerative disease at a pseudarthrosis, and MRI will show edema related to abnormal motion (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2. A 19-year-old man with pain over the dorsal carpal bones for 1 month. (A) A lateral radiograph shows an os styloidium (arrow). (B) Corresponding coronal inversion recovery and (C) T1-weighted images show edema in the os styloideum (arrows). There is also adjacent edema in the base of the third meta-carpal (arrowheads). This implies abnormal motion consistent with carpal bossing.

Advertisement

Sesamoid bones of the hand

Most people have 5 sesamoid bones in each hand: 2 at the thumb metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint, 1 at the interphalangeal joint of the thumb, 1 at the MCP joint of the index finger, and 1 at the MCP joint of the small finger.6 Traumatic, inflammatory, and arthritic conditions can affect the sesamoid bones of the hand. Thumb sesamoid fractures usually result from hyperextension injury to the MCP joint. These fractures may be associated with rupture of the palmar plate or accessory collateral ligaments.7 Radiography is usually sufficient for diagnosis; however, oblique views are often necessary for the diagnosis of a fracture (Figure 3).

FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3. A 40-year-old woman with pain and swelling over the left 2nd metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint. This oblique radiograph shows a horizontal lucency that lacks sclerotic margins through the sesamoid bone of the index finger MCP joint (arrow), which is consistent with a nondisplaced fracture.

Patella

Patella fractures are usually transverse, often resulting from rapid flexion against a fully contracted quadriceps. Osteochondral fractures may result from a direct blow or patellar dislocation. Children are vulnerable to this type of fracture because of patellar mobility.

Differentiation of an acute patella fracture from a bipartite patella may be difficult. The bipartite patella is a synchondrosis, found in 1% to 2% of the population (Figures 4 and 5). Bipartite patellas are classified into 3 types. Type I is located at the inferior pole (5% of all cases), type II is at the lateral patellar margin (20%), and type III is at the superolateral margin (75%). Most (98%) remain asymptomatic, but direct trauma may disrupt the synchondroses (Figure 4).8 A dorsal defect of the patella is sometimes associated with bipartite or multipartite patella, which is seen as a focal lucency in the superolateral patella covered by articular cartilage (Figure 5).9

FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4. A 44-year-old man following a fall onto the left knee. (A) A coronal T2-weighted fast spin-echo MRI shows a superolateral bipartite patella (arrow). (B) An axial T2-weighted fast spin-echo MRI with fat suppression shows a bipartite patella with edema around the synchondrosis (arrow) and a moderate-size joint effusion (arrowhead).
FIGURE 5.
FIGURE 5. A 12-year-old with anterior left knee pain. (A) An anteroposterior radiograph shows a bipartite patella (arrow). Note the typical features of a bipartite patella: a wide radiolucent line coursing across the superolateral margin of the patella, with smooth, well-corticated, opposing margins. (B) An anteroposterior radiograph in the same patient who was experiencing recurrent anterior knee pain 4 years after the initial presentation. This radiograph shows a 1-cm–diameter radiolucency in the superolateral portion of the patella with a well-circumscribed, sclerotic border (arrow), which is consistent with a dorsal defect of the patella that evolved from a bipartite patella. (C) An axial fast spin-echo proton-density MRI shows a well-defined, 1-cm–diameter focus of the posterior patella that is covered by articular cartilage (arrow).

Other categories of disease that affect the patella include degenerative or metabolic disease and benign or malignant primary or metastatic tumors (Figures 6 and 7). Reported tumors include chondroblastoma, histiocytosis, giant cell tumor, simple bone cyst, brown tumor of hyperparathyroidism, hemangioma, osteo chondroma, lipoma, and osteoblastoma. Malignant tumors include lymphoma and hemangioendothelioma. Metastatic tumors and myeloma are rare.

FIGURE 6.
FIGURE 6. A 76-year-old man with left knee pain and history of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. (A) A lateral radiograph shows an ill-defined lytic lesion in the patella (arrow), which was subsequently proven at biopsy to represent metastatic disease. (B) A technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate bone scan shows a focal area of increased tracer uptake in the region of the left patella (arrow). The tracer injection site is noted in the right antecubital fossa (arrowhead). (C) An axial T2-weighted MRI shows the lesion of the patella (arrow).
FIGURE 7.
FIGURE 7. 55-year-old man with tophaceous gout of the patella. A sagittal T2-weighted MRI shows an ill-defined destructive lesion (arrow) of intermediate-low signal intensity with associated cortical breakthrough and a soft tissue mass at the proximal aspect of the patella (arrowhead).

Os trigonum

Between 8 and 13 years of age, an ossification center forms posterior to the talus. Normally, this ossification center fuses with the talus within 1 year. In approximately 7% of the population, it remains separate and is referred to as the os trigonum. The os trigonum is corticated and articulates with the lateral talar tubercle through a synchondrosis. Os trigonum syndrome results from repetitive microtrauma or acute forced plantar flexion of the foot. The chondro-osseous border of the synchondrosis may be injured either as a chronic stress fracture or, less frequently, as an acute fracture.10

An os trigonum is usually round or oval with well-defined corticated margins, whereas a fracture of the lateral tubercle typically has irregular serrated margins between the fragment and the posterior talus. Lateral radiographs obtained with the foot in plantar flexion may show the os trigonum impinged between the posterior tibia malleolus and the calcaneal tuberosity (Figure 8). MRI is very useful in establishing the diagnosis of os trigonum syndrome (Figure 8). Because of its location between the medial and lateral talar tubercles, inflammatory changes may be seen in the flexor hallucis longus tendon in patients with os trigonum syndrome.10

FIGURE 8.
FIGURE 8. A 29-year-old man had sustained an ankle injury 2 months prior and presented with persistent and increasing posterior ankle pain. (A) A lateral radiograph shows a large os trigonum surrounded by soft tissue edema (arrow). (B) A sagittal inversion recovery MRI shows bone marrow edema involving the os trigonum and, to a lesser extent, the adjacent posterior aspect of the talus. Note the fluid/edema between the os trigonum and the talus (arrow), small subchondral cysts in the posterior aspect of the talus, and edema in the posterior soft tissues. These findings imply abnormal motion related to os trigonum syndrome.

Advertisement

Os calcaneus secundarius

The os calcaneus secundarius is an accessory ossicle of the anterior facet of the calcaneus, which may be mistaken for a fracture of the anterior process. Radiographically, the os calcaneus secundarius is best seen on the medial oblique view (Figure 9). Although it is uncommon for an os calcaneus secundarius to cause symptoms, range of motion of the subtalar joint may be limited by the ossicle, clinically resembling a calcaneona-vicular coalition.11

FIGURE 9.
FIGURE 9. A 32-year-old man with midfoot pain. A medial oblique radiograph shows a large os calcaneus secundarius projected between the anterior calcaneus and the navicular (arrow). Spurs are seen along the adjacent articular surface of the talus, which implies abnormal motion at this area.

Accessory navicular (os tibiale externum, os naviculare secundarium)

There are 3 types of accessory navicular.12,13 Type I, or os tibiale externum, occurs when an ossification center forms a sesamoid bone within the tibialis posterior tendon, near the navicular insertion. Type I ossicles are generally well-defined round or oval bones, measuring approximately 2 to 3 mm in diameter, and are located up to 5 mm medial and posterior to the medial aspect of the navicular. In type II accessory navicular, the ossification center measures approximately 9 to 12 mm in size, and resides adjacent to the tubercle of the navicular bone. A residual cartilaginous synchondrosis joins the triangular type II ossicle approximately 1 to 2 mm medial and posterior to the navicular. The majority or entire tibialis posterior tendon inserts on the type II accessory ossicle. The type III accessory navicular, or cornuate navicular, is a prominent navicular tuberosity, which is essentially a type II ossicle connected to the medial aspect of the parent navicular by an osseous bridge.

Of the 3 patterns, the type II accessory navicular is most commonly associated with medial foot pain.14,15 A valgus stress injury may fracture the synchondrosis, resulting in abnormal motion. MRI is the most specific imaging modality for detecting the symptomatic accessory navicular, showing edema in the bone and soft tissues (Figures 10 and 11).

FIGURE 10.
FIGURE 10. A 24-year-old woman with medial foot pain following injury. (A) An anteroposterior radiograph shows a type II accessory navicular (arrow) exhibiting an articulation with the navicular bone that simulates a fracture. (B) Sagittal inversion recovery image of the mid-foot shows a type II accessory navicular that articulates with the navicular bone, with associated bone marrow edema and cystic changes around both sites of the articulation (arrow).
FIGURE 11.
FIGURE 11. A 39-year-old man with persistent medial foot pain and a history of prior trauma to the foot and ankle. An axial CT image shows a type II accessory navicular (arrow) articulating with the medial aspect of the navicular bone, with irregular articulating surfaces and osteophytes.

Os peroneum

The os peroneum is an oval or round ossicle located within the substance of the distal peroneus longus tendon near the cuboid. Fractures of the os peroneum result from direct trauma or indirect stress from dorsiflexion of the foot (Figure 12). Fractures of the os peroneum are typically associated with peroneus longus tendon dysfunction, which may be either acute or chronic.16,17

FIGURE 12.
FIGURE 12. A 34-year-old woman with foot pain status-post trauma. (A) Anteroposterior and (B) lateral radiographs show fragmentation/fracture of an os peroneum (arrows) and a transverse fracture of the fifth metatarsal base (arrowheads).

Advertisement

Os intermetatarseum

Os intermetatarseum is present in approximately 1% of feet. It is situated superiorly between the first and second metatarsal bases.18 It may articulate with the medial cuneiform or be attached to the first metatarsal base. The ossicle is best visualized on the anteroposterior view. It may be round, oval, kidney-shaped, linear, or even resemble a rudimentary metatarsal (Figure 13). Although infrequently symptomatic, an os intermetatarseum may cause dorsal midfoot pain from compression of the medial branch of the deep peroneal nerve.

FIGURE 13.
FIGURE 13. A 27-year-old with a history of multiple ankle injuries and chronic foot pain. An anteroposterior radiograph shows an os intermetatarseum situated between the first and second metatarsal bases (arrow).

Hallux sesamoids

The hallux sesamoids can be associated with acute or stress fractures.18 Although much less common than stress fractures, avascular necrosis of the hallux sesamoid bones should be considered in the differential diagnosis of persistent forefoot pain.19 The tibial sesamoid is more likely to fracture than the fibular sesamoid because of weight-bearing mechanics (Figure 14).20 Compared with a fractured sesamoid, a bi-partite bone is usually larger and has smooth margins.

In addition to standard radiographic views, an axial sesamoid projection is often helpful. MRI will show edema if the bone is fractured (Figure 15).

FIGURE 14.
FIGURE 14. A 44-year-old woman with pain in the 1st metatarsophalangeal region. (A) Anteroposterior and (B) lateral radiographs show a transverse fracture through the central portion of the tibial hallux sesamoid bone, with mild distraction of the 2 fragments (arrows).
FIGURE 15.
FIGURE 15. A 29-year-old female competitive runner with foot pain. (A) Sagittal T1-weighted and (B) inversion recovery T2-weighted images show marrow edema in the hallux sesamoid bone (arrows), which is consistent with a stress fracture.

Conclusion

We have reviewed a spectrum of pathology involving accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones. These normal anatomic variations may, in fact, represent the source of patient symptomatology. The identification of key imaging characteristics can help determine whether or not to attribute clinical symptoms to these structures.

References

  1. Warner J, Beim G, Higgins L. The treatment of symptomatic os acromiale. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:1320-1326.
  2. Park J, Lee J, Phelps C. Os acromiale associated with rotator cuff impingement: MR imaging of the shoulder. Radiology. 1994;193:255-257.
  3. Kurtz C, Humble B, Rodosky M, Sekiya J. Symptomatic os acromiale. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14:12-19.
  4. Mellado J, Calmet J, Domènech S, Saurí A. Clinically significant skeletal variations of the shoulder and the wrist: Role of MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:1735-1743.
  5. Conway W, Destouet J, Gilula L. The carpal boss: An overview of radiographic evaluation. Radiology. 1985;156:29-31.
  6. Wood V. The sesamoid bones of the hand and their pathology. J Hand Surg [Br]. 1984;9:261-264.
  7. Dong P, Seeger L, Shapiro M, Levere S. Fractures of the sesmoid bones of the thumb. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23:336-339.
  8. Elias D, White L. Imaging of patellofemoral disorders. Clin Radiol. 2004;59:543-557.
  9. van Holsbeeck M, Vandamme B, Marchal G. Dorsal defect of the patella: Concept of its origin and relationship with bipartite and multipartite patella. Skeletal Radiol. 1987;16:304-311.
  10. Bureau N, Cardinal E, Hobden R, Aubin B. Posterior ankle impingement syndrome: MR imaging findings in seven patients. Radiology. 2000;215:497-503.
  11. Ceroni D, De Coulon G, Spadola L. Cal caneus secundarius presenting as calcaneonavicular coalition: A case report. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2006;45:25-27.
  12. Lawson J, Ogden J, Sella E, Barwick K. The painful accessory navicular. Skeletal Radiol. 1984;12:250-262.
  13. Sella E, Lawson J, Ogden J. The accessory navicular synchondrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;209:280-285.
  14. Mosel L, Kat E, Voyvodic F. Imaging of the symptomatic type II accessory navicular bone. Australas Radiol. 2004;48:267-271.
  15. Miller T, Staron R, Feldman F. The symptomatic accessory tarsal navicular bone: Assessment with MR imaging. Radiology. 1995;195:849-853.
  16. Peacock K, Resnick E, Thoder J. Fracture of the os peroneum with rupture of the peroneus longus tendon. A case report and review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;202:223-226.
  17. Brigido M, Fessell D, Jacobson J. Radiography and US of os peroneum fractures and associated peroneal tendon injuries: Initial experience. Radiology. 2005;237:235-241.
  18. Mellado J, Ramos A, Salvado E. Accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones of the ankle and foot: Imaging findings, clinical significance and differential diagnosis. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(suppl 6):L164-L177.
  19. Toussirot E, Jeunet L, Michel F. Avascular necrosis of the hallucal sesamoids update with reference to two case-reports. Joint Bone Spine. 2003;70:307-309.
  20. Biedert R, Hintermann B. Stress fractures of the medial great toe sesamoids in athletes. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24:137-141.

Citation

Kalantari BN, Seeger LL, Motamedi K, Chow K. Accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones: Spectrum of pathology and imaging evaluation. Applied Radiology. 2007;36(10):28-37. doi:10.37549/AR1556.