Diffusion imaging in the spine

Applied Radiology — Vol. 40 , Issue 4 , pp. 9 -15

DOI: 10.37549/AR1814

Published: April 1, 2011

Lawrence N. Tanenbaum, MD, FACR

Categories

article article article

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is a powerful tool for tissue interrogation with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). By sensitizing the MR image to perturbations of the random motion of water molecules in tissues, DWI provides unique insight into pathologic physiology. DWI revolutionized the evaluation of patients with suspected stroke by providing exquisite sensitivity to the presence of brain infarction, virtually immediately after onset. DWI also provides the critical ability to differentiate chronic ischemic brain changes from those due to recent stroke in patients who present in the subacute stroke setting. Perhaps the most impactful role of DWI in the brain is in lesion characterization—the differentiation of stroke and abscess from tumor, and in the assessment and surveillance of demyelinating disease (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1. (A) A 25-year-old male with a “mass” lesion in the left centrum semiovale. Hyperintensity on the isotropic diffusion image (B) supports the diagnosis of demyelinating disease.

DWI of the spine

Of late, DWI has become popular for imaging outside the brain and is now used for routine MR studies of the breast and body, providing a boost in lesion sensitivity as well as valuable characterization information. One of the most fruitful extracranial extensions of DWI is to the spine, offering information similar to that provided for brain studies when assessing the spinal cord as well as making a powerful contribution to the detection and characterization of intradural-extramedullary, epidural, and osseous lesions.

Advertisement

Spinal cord lesions

DWI can be very helpful in the characterization of cord lesions. Active demyelinating lesions tend to be hyperintense on DWI (Figure 2). This can assist in the differentiation from neoplastic lesions (Figure 3) as well as chronic demyelination, both of which tend tobe more isointense with the normal cord. Primary cord tumors tend to be closer to isointense with the normal spinal cord (Figure 4) asdo metastatic lesions. As in the brain, if lesions are hemorrhagic or exhibit a dense cellularity due to a high nuclear to cytoplasmicratio, some hyperintensity on DWI will result (Figure 5). As in the brain, acute infarctions of the cord will exhibit diffusion restriction(Figure 6). The characteristic hyperintensity of DWI is useful in the differentiation of infarction from neoplasm. Acute traumatic cord injuries tend to exhibit hyperintensity on DWI (Figure 7). A well-known diagnostic challenge is differentiation of edema from myelomalacia in the setting of spondylosis and cord compression. Edema from acute cord compression tends to reveal diffusion hyperintensity, while myelomalacia tends to appear isointense to hypointense with the adjacent normal cord (Figure 8).

FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2. Multiple sclerosis. These 3T images of the spine include: a (A) fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) image, (B) T2 fast spin-echo (FSE) image, and (C) echo-planar diffusion-weighted image (DWI). Note the ventral, rostral pontine, and dorsal C1 lesions (arrows), which are DWI hyperintense and faintly enhancing. The more chronic lesion at ventral C4-5 is nonenhancing and DWI isointense.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3. Ependymoma. (A) Reformatted balanced steady-state free precession (SSFP), (B) echo-planar imaging (EPI) DWI, and (C) postcontrast T1 SE images show the fusiform lesion at C5-6, which is isointense with the adjacent cord on DWI.
FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4. Astrocytoma shown in (A) sagittal FSE T2, (B) single-shot FSE (SSFSE) DWI, and (C) postcontrast T1 FLAIR images. Note the fusiform intramedullary cervical cord lesion, which demonstrates irregular ring-like enhancement. The tumor is isointense with cord on DWI.
FIGURE 5.
FIGURE 5. Cord metastasis. (A) T2 FSE and (B) EPI DWI images reveal an intramedullary metastasis at C2. Note the hypointensity on T2 and hyperintensity on DWI consistent with dense lesion cellularity.
FIGURE 6.
FIGURE 6. Cord infarction. These (A) T2 FSE and (B) EPI apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) images are of a 60-year-old woman who experienced paraparesis on awakening from spinal surgery. Note the fusiform swelling of the conus associated with T2 hyperintensity and diffusion restriction.
FIGURE 7.
FIGURE 7. Cord contusion. (A) T1 FLAIR, (B) short TI inversion recovery (STIR), (C) EPI isotropic, and (D) ADC DWI images show multiple vertebral fractures as well as the fusiform cord contusion at C6-7. There is subtle hyperintensity on the DWI along with reduction of the ADC.
FIGURE 8.
FIGURE 8. Acute cord compression. 45-year-old female patient with acute back pain and myelopathy. These are (A) T2 FSE, (B) T1 FLAIR, (C) EPI DWI isotropic, and (D) ADC images. A herniation at T11-12 compresses the cord and produces subtle T2 changes. Note the striking diffusion restriction.

By scanning a minimum of 6 unique direction-sensitized diffusion images, one can display the diffusion tensor. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) assists in assessing the integrity and orientation of white matter tracts leveraging their inherent ordering or anisotropy. This can give insight into the present and extent of myelopathic changes that may be too subtle for routine imaging to reveal (Figures 9 and 10). Diffusion tensor myelograms (DTM) can be helpful in localizing lesions as intrinsic or extrinsic to the cord and refining differential diagnosis (Figure 11). DTM may also be helpful in differentiation between types of intramedullary lesions by displaying displacement rather than infiltration of cord fibers (Figure 12).

FIGURE 9.
FIGURE 9. Cord contusion. (A) Sagittal STIR, (B) EPI diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) fractional anisotropy, and (C) axial T2 FSE images show a fusiform cord contusion at C6-7, which is manifest as a striking reduction in fractional anisotropy.
FIGURE 10.
FIGURE 10. DTI in multiple sclerosis shown in (A) T2 FSE, (B) postcontrast fat-suppressed T1 FLAIR, (C) EPI DWI isotropic, and (D) DTI fractional anisotropy images. Note the multiple lesions on T2-weighted images manifest as loss of anisotropy of the involved tracts.
FIGURE 11.
FIGURE 11. Meningioma. Tractography of the spinal cord can assist in lesion evaluation and localization. (A) Diffusion tensor myelogram (DTM), (B) fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1 FLAIR, and (C) T2 FSE images are shown here. Note the enhancing lesion at C2 that appears to be within the substance of the cord based on routine imaging. The DTM study demonstrates extrinsic mass effect upon the cord white matter consistent with a lesion in an extramedullary location.
FIGURE 12.
FIGURE 12. Ependymoma. These are (A) axial T2 FSE and (B) DTI, (C) oblique diffusion tensor myelograms (DTM), and (D) sagittal T2 FSE images. Tractography of the spinal cord can assist in lesion characterization. Note the fusiform intramedullary lesion at C5-6 that appears to be displacing rather than infiltrating cord fibers.

Advertisement

Extradural lesions

DWI is a powerful adjunct to the routine imaging of extradural lesions. DWI can add sensitivity to the presence of osseous lesions of the spine.1 When added to the routine sequences employed for the assessment of suspected metastatic disease and myeloma,DWI improves the detectability and conspicuity of many lesions. In recent trials,2,3 approximately 50% of lesions, identified as part of an MRI neoplastic survey, were most conspicuous on DWI compared to routine sequences, including short TI inversion recovery (STIR), T1 pre- and postcontrast techniques. While approximately 20% of lesions were better seen on routine sequences, up to 10% of lesions were seen only onDWI or were solely evident in retrospect with routine scanning techniques (Figures 13 and 14). Though quite powerful in the evaluation of osseous tumors, DWI has not proven to be a definitive tool for the challenging differentiation of benign senescent compression fractures from pathologic fractures4-6 (Figures 15 and 16). Just as in the and fractures can be difficult to appreciate with routine spine imaging sequences employing fast spin-echo T2-weighted images, particularly if fat-suppressed or STIR techniques are not employed. These conditions create conspicuous signal changes on DWI that may assist in their identification (Figure 22).

FIGURE 17.
FIGURE 17. Discitis and osteomyelitis. These (A) T2 FSE, (B) T1 FLAIR, (C) fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1 FLAIR, and (D) EPI DWI images show the characteristic hyperintensity of signal within the vertebral bodies and disc space supporting the diagnosis of an infectious process.
FIGURE 18.
FIGURE 18. Epidural and intradural abscess. (A) T2 FSE, (B) T1 FLAIR, (C) fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1 FLAIR, and (D) EPI DWI images show the characteristic hyperintensity of signal within the posterior epidural soft tissues as well as the distal thecal sac consistent with abscess.
FIGURE 19.
FIGURE 19. Epidural hematoma. These (A) T1 FLAIR, (B) T2 FSE, (C) fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1 FLAIR, and (D) EPI DWI, and (E) inset axial T2 FSE show the lentiform T1 hyperintense hematoma dorsal to the cord from C5-7. Note the susceptibility related signal loss within the hematoma on T2 FSE that is exaggerated with EPI DWI.

Advertisement

Technique

While currently available, echo-planar imaging (EPI) techniques for DWI are not ideal for imaging the spine due to issues of susceptibility artifact and distortion. With minor modifications to the protocol parameters in use for brain imaging, satisfactory studies of the spine can be obtained (Figure 23). A more moderate B value (between 400 and 500) is chosen to maintain a short echo time(TE). Minimizing the frequency encoding steps reduces TE as well. Lower TE values improve signal to noise and reduce distortion. New techniques for DWI, including reduced field-of-view EPI should provide even better image quality in the near future.

FIGURE 20.
FIGURE 20. Degenerative disease. (A) T1 FLAIR and (B) EPI DWI images show type II degenerative changes at L2-3 and L5-S1 with high T1 signal within the endplates due to fatty transformation. This has the characteristic appearance of a widened disc space (arrows) on the DWI images, which are fat suppressed.
FIGURE 21.
FIGURE 21. Degenerative disease. (A) T1 FLAIR, (B) fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1 FLAIR, (C) T2 FSE, and (D) EPI DWI images show type I degenerative changes at L4-5 with low T1 and high T2 signals adjacent to the endplates along with enhancement due to granulation tissue and edema. There is a characteristic “claw sign” (arrows) of restricted diffusion at the boundary of the type I changes and the normal marrow.
FIGURE 22.
FIGURE 22. Stress reaction. These images are (A) T1 FLAIR, Figure 23. Protocol for DW-EPI scanning. (B) STIR, (C) T2 FSE, (D) EPI DWI, and (E) axial FSE. Note the signal changes (circles) best appreciated with STIR and EPI DWI.
FIGURE 23.
FIGURE 23. Protocol for DW-EPI scanning.

Conclusion

DWI is one of the most powerful tools available in clinical MRI. Adding this technique to the array of sequences employed for routine scanning of the spine offers a valuable boost in sensitivity and the ability to characterize lesions.

References

  1. Dietrich O, Biffar A, Reiser M, Baur-Melnyk A. Diffusion-weighted imaging of bone marrow. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2009;13:134-144.
  2. Parag Y, Delman B, Pawha P, Tanenbaum L. Diffusion weighted imaging facilitates detection of spinal metastases and assists in the diagnosis of equivocal lesions. Paper presented at: American Society of Spine Radiology Annual Meeting 2010;. 2010.
  3. Kessler J, Pawha P, Shpilberg K, Tanenbaum L. Diffusion weighted imaging facilitates detection of spinal multiple myeloma and assists in diagnosing equivocal lesions. Paper presented at: American Society of Spine Radiology Annual Symposium 2011. 2011.
  4. Castillo M, Arbelaez A, Smith J, Fisher L. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging offers no advantage over routine noncontrast MR imaging in the detection of vertebral metastases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:948-953.
  5. Karchevsky M, Babb J, Schweitzer M. Can diffusion-weighted imaging be used to differentiate benign from pathologic fractures? A meta-analysis. Skeletal Radiol. 2008;37:791-795.
  6. Castillo M. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the spine: Is it reliable?. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24:1251-1253.

Citation

Tanenbaum LN. Diffusion imaging in the spine. Applied Radiology. 2011;40(4):9-15. doi:10.37549/AR1814.