RCOM RADIOLOGICAL CASE OF THE MONTH

Applied Radiology — Vol. 34 , Issue 1 , pp. 35 -38

DOI: 10.37549/AR1309

Published: January 1, 2005

Berkeley R. Hanson, MD, Anna K. Henisz, MD, PhD, Paul M. Silverman, MD

Categories

article Article ar

CASE SUMMARY

A 60-year-old woman with a history of ventral hernia repair presented with a 1-month history of severe, colicky, periumbilical pain, nausea, and vomiting. Physical examination revealed a soft abdomen with periumbilical tenderness and guarding. Laboratory evaluation was normal. Ultrasound (not shown), computed tomography (CT) (Figure 1), and small-bowel barium study (Figure 2) were performed and followed by laparoscopy.

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1. (A) The CT image obtained during examination of abdomen with use of oral and intravenous contrast reveals intussusception of lipoma with mesenteric vessels projecting into the bowel lumen. (B) This is the image of an intussuscepted intraluminal lipoma obtained during the examination.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2. (A and B) Images obtained during routine barium small-bowel examination showing intussuscepted lipoma with characteristic appearance of coiled-spring bowel mucosa and smooth pliable filling defect in lumen, which represents lipoma.

Advertisement

DIAGNOSIS

Small-bowel lipoma causing intussusception

Advertisement

IMAGING FINDINGS

Ultrasound evaluation of the abdomen showed no evidence of cholecystitis or ascites (not shown). A contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis revealed a well-circumscribed 4- × 4-cm mass of homogenous fatty attenuation within the lumen of the distal small bowel. In the area of the mass, the bowel wall was abnormally thickened and small mesenteric vessels were being pulled into the bowel lumen by an invaginating loop of bowel consistent with a small-bowel intussusception (Figure 1). A subsequent barium smallbowel study showed a filling defect with a coiled-spring appearance in the distal ileum (Figure 2).

Laparoscopic resection of the involved section of distal ileum was performed. The gross pathologic specimen showed a submucosal lipoma with superficial mucosal necrosis and intense submucosal congestion consistent with intussusception (Figure 3).

FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3. (A) This gross image of resected submucosal lipoma with superficial mucosal necrosis ulceration and intense submucosal congestion is consistent with intussusception. (B) On the cut section, the mass is well circumscribed, intramural, and yellow. (C) The microscopic image shows submucosal location of lipoma.

Advertisement

DISCUSSION

Historically, lipomas were diagnosed due to smallbowel obstruction, but with the current wide use of CT, especially for evaluation of abdominal pain, CT features are now readily recognized.

Intussusception in adults is relatively rare, occurring in <5% of all intussusceptions and causing approximately 1% of bowel obstructions.1,2 More than 80% of cases in adults have a known cause, the most common being neoplasm, malignant more common than benign, followed by idiopathic, postoperative complications and adhesions, Meckel’s diverticulum, foreign body, inflammation, lymphoid hyperplasia, and celiac disease. Neoplasms serving as the lead point of colonic intussusception are more commonly malignant, while those causing enteric intussusceptions are usually benign. Adult intussusceptions can be ileocolic, colocolic, enteroenteric, or jejunogastric and are without anatomic predilection.3,4

This case was diagnosed on CT examination and confirmed on a small-bowel barium study. We were able to document intussusceptions on both studies of the same patient. Moreover, the presence of a large ulceration, which was obvious on the pathologic examination, was not visible on either study. Although lipomas are a common benign tumor of the small bowel, second only to leiomyomas, and >50% arise in the ileum, they have rarely been reported as cases of intussusceptions.

Small-bowel lipomas are usually solitary but may be multiple. Most small-bowel lipomas are submucosal and project into the lumen, which can serve as a lead point for intussusceptions. On CT, a lipoma can be identified as a smooth hypoattenuated mass of-50 to -100 HU.5,6

Antegrade and retrograde barium studies of the small bowel and colon, respectively, can be used to evaluate intussusceptions. In both the small bowel and colon, an intussusception causing incomplete obstruction is found as contrast material trapped between the intussusceptum and intussuscipiens creating a “coiled-spring” appearance. Complete obstruction causes a beak-like appearance at the point of obstruction.7

Intussusceptions can also be evaluated via ultrasonography, although not typically as an initial study. In cross-section, the alternating layers of mucosa, bowel wall, and mesenteric fat are seen as alternating concentric rings of hyperechoic and hypoechoic soft tissue.8 Intussusception is best revealed by CT, and its findings are usually pathognomonic.9

The CT features include a soft-tissue mass with a target-like (cross-sectional images) or sausage-like (sagittal images) appearance. The central area of the target lesion is typically hypoattuenuated, representing invaginated mesenteric fat and vasculature and the intussusceptum, and is surrounded by a thickened intussuscipiens.10 Other CT findings include trapped oral contrast material between the intussusceptum and intussuscipiens and a thickened bowel wall with intramural air if the vascular supply is compromised.11

After diagnosis, surgery is required in symptomatic patients or in those who develop related complications. At the time of surgery, the area of intussusception and, if appropriate, the inciting mass are removed. If a benign tumor, such as homogenously fatty mass, is suspected at the time of surgery, a laparoscopic approach should be considered, which is a less invasive procedure; therefore, the patient has a quicker recovery.12

CONCLUSION

The positive diagnosis of bowel lipoma before surgery will indicate laparoscopic approach rather than a routine laparotomy. This approach is less invasive, is better tolerated, and offers a patient faster recovery.

References

  1. Azar T, Berger D. Adult intussusception. Ann Surg. 1997;226:134-138.
  2. Chekan E, Westcott C, Low V, Ludwig K. Small bowel intussusception and laparoscopy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998;8:324-326.
  3. Urbano J, Serantes A, Hemandez L, Turegano F. Lipoma-induced jejunojejunal intussusception: US and CT diagnosis. Abdom Imaging. 1996;21:522-524.
  4. Mindelzun R, McCort J, Margulis A, Burhenne H. Alimentary Tract Radiology. 1989:341-343.
  5. Baert A. The Encyclopaedia of Medical Imaging.
  6. Ross G, Amilineni V. Case 26: Jejunal intussusception secondary to a lipoma. Radiology. 2000;216:727-730.
  7. Ott D, Chen M. Specific acute colonic disorders. Radiol Clin N Am. 1994;32:871-874.
  8. Eustace S, Murray J, O’Connell D. Sonographic diagnosis of colonic lipoma-induced intussusception. J Clin Ultrasound. 1993;21:472-474.
  9. Gayer G, Apter S, Hofmann C. Intussusception in adults: CT diagnosis. Clin Radiol. 1998;53:53-57.
  10. Kuestermann S, Saleeb S, Teplick S. General case of the day. Jejunal intussusception caused by an inflammatory fibroid polyp (IFP). RadioGraphics. 1999;19:539-541.
  11. Warshauer D, Lee J. Adult intussusception detected at CT or MR imaging: Clinical-imaging correlation. Radiology. 1999;212:853-860.
  12. Reijnen H, Joosten H, de Boer H. Diagnosis and treatment of adult intussusception. Am J Surg. 1989;158:25-28.

Citation

Hanson BR, Henisz AK, Silverman PM. RCOM RADIOLOGICAL CASE OF THE MONTH. Applied Radiology. 2005;34(1):35-38. doi:10.37549/AR1309.